← The library / Protection

Mineral vs chemical sunscreen: what we know and what we don’t

Filter absorption, endocrine disruptors and how to choose, with the strength of the evidence behind each claim. No alarm, no dogma.

Illustration: Protection

01 / The short answer

Both protect. What differs is what we know about each.

A mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide or titanium dioxide) and a chemical one protect just as well at the same SPF, as long as you apply them properly. The difference is long-term safety data: mineral filters barely get through the skin, while several chemical filters do reach the blood, although harm to people has not been shown. If you'd rather be cautious, mineral is a reasonable choice. What is proven to harm your skin is getting burned.

02 / How each one works

Less different than the label suggests.

The usual story is that chemical filters absorb UV while mineral filters reflect it like a mirror. That's only partly true: zinc oxide and titanium dioxide also work mostly by absorbing UV and reflect only a small share. Cole et al., 2016 ↗

What does change is how they feel. Chemical sunscreens (avobenzone, octocrylene, homosalate…) tend to be lighter, clear and easy to spread. Mineral ones can leave a white cast, especially on darker skin, but they tend to irritate less and sting the eyes less. Zinc oxide covers UVB and UVA well; titanium dioxide protects less against part of UVA, which is why many formulas combine them.

Either way, real protection depends on the amount: almost everyone applies far less than the amount used to test SPF. NHS ↗

03 / Absorption

What the FDA measured.

In 2019 and 2020 the US Food and Drug Administration measured in controlled trials how much filter reaches the blood. Six common chemical filters (avobenzone, oxybenzone, octocrylene, homosalate, octisalate and octinoxate) went above the level at which the FDA asks for more safety studies after a single application. Matta et al., JAMA 2019 ↗ Matta et al., JAMA 2020 ↗

Being absorbed doesn't make a filter dangerous. It means more data is needed. That's why the FDA proposed recognising only zinc oxide and titanium dioxide as safe and effective on current data, and asked for more studies on the rest without withdrawing them. FDA 2019 ↗ The same trials recommended that people keep using sunscreen.

04 / Endocrine disruptors

What's been seen in the lab, and what hasn't in people.

Some filters, especially oxybenzone (benzophenone-3), show hormonal activity in cells and in animals exposed to high doses. In people, with normal use, there's no evidence of harm. Studies are few and research continues.

As a precaution, the European Union lowered the maximum allowed concentration of oxybenzone and octocrylene in cosmetics in 2022. Regulation (EU) 2022/1176 ↗ That's how regulation works: when there are reasonable doubts, exposure is limited while more data arrives.

05 / How to choose

Shade first. Then the sunscreen you'll actually wear.

The WHO ranks protection like this, with sunscreen as a complement rather than a substitute: WHO ↗

  1. Time: short sessions, below your burn time.
  2. Shade during high-UV hours.
  3. Clothing, a hat and sunglasses: they protect without your skin absorbing anything. UPF-rated clothing is the most reliable.
  4. Sunscreen on the skin still in the sun: broad spectrum, SPF 30 or higher, applied generously and reapplied every two hours and after swimming.

If your skin is sensitive, you're choosing for children or you'd rather avoid filters that are absorbed, look for a zinc oxide mineral sunscreen. If mineral means you won't wear it, a well-applied chemical sunscreen protects far better than none.

06 / What Taiyo does

It will never suggest burning without sunscreen.

Taiyo respects each person's choice about sunscreen, but it will never suggest staying in the sun unprotected beyond half your burn time. With or without sunscreen, what harms skin is burning. If you don't want to use sunscreen, the app suggests short sessions and tells you when to find shade or cover up.

Make your own comparison

Give it a place and time.

Explore a scenario with your location, skin type and clothing. The calculator shows its assumptions, an illustrative range and when it proposes no minutes.

Open the calculator ↗

Follow the sources

Evidence and limitations

  1. Green AC, Williams GM, Logan V, Strutton GM. Reduced melanoma after regular sunscreen use: randomized trial follow-up. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:257–263
  2. Matta MK et al. Effect of sunscreen application under maximal use conditions on plasma concentration of sunscreen active ingredients. JAMA 2019;321:2082–2091
  3. Matta MK et al. Effect of sunscreen application on plasma concentration of sunscreen active ingredients. JAMA 2020;323:256–267
  4. U.S. FDA. Sunscreen drug products for over-the-counter human use; proposed rule. Federal Register 2019;84:6204–6275
  5. Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/1176 amending Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 as regards the use of certain UV filters in cosmetic products
  6. Cole C, Shyr T, Ou-Yang H. Metal oxide sunscreens protect skin by absorption, not by reflection or scattering. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2016;32:5–10
  7. NHS · Sunscreen and sun safety
  8. WHO · Ultraviolet radiation

Educational content: it does not determine your vitamin D levels, a diagnosis or a supplement dose.

Our editorial method ↗